What makes the NPC fail

insidetheclub

What makes the NPC fail

By Teodoro Valencia

Simply stated, the emphasis on “rights” and the disregard for duties and responsibilities of the members of the National Press Club has been the main cause of the failure of the club to achieve its goals. The second big cause of failure has been the sublimation of the good of the club to political ambitions of the few. A third big reason has been the failure of club officials to realize that the primary objective of the club is to provide them a meeting place instead of a political arena.

I was among the doubters who refused to join the National Press Club after an unpleasant experience in 1953 when the annual election of officers held at the Malacanang Park turned out to be a politician’s nightmare instead of a healthy get-together of brethren in the profession. I thought this attitude would die the moment we could put up a press building. We were wrong. After a brief respite, the apathy and indifference of club members to what’s good for them, came back.

Since 1955, the National Press Club has done great things for its members. We have settled so many in permanent homes in the various government housing projects. The press has since become a cohesive force for good, speaking with one voice in times of national crisis. We have had successful attempts to gain international recognition as an active force in the press of the free world. But, sad to say, the club itself has degenerated. It is no longer the gathering place of the press. The building stands as a symbol of unity but it has failed to generate the fellowship that it was meant to promote.

The tragedy is that every member of the Press Club is aware of his Rights. He complains loudly about bad meals, about prices and about the lack of facilities in his club. Yet, nobody has ever thought of the need for supporting the club adequately. The P1-a-month fee is entirely out of the line with present needs of the club and yet every attempt to raise funds was met with strong opposition. We want a first-class club on a tenth-rate fee. We want something for nothing. Nobody ever got that. We won’t either.

The result of these is that the administrations of the club have depended entirely on the personality of whoever was President of the club. IN other words, group action never ruled the Press Club. A careless President meant a careless carefree administration. A fighting President meant a good administration. The members could not care less. They left everything to the President and felt that their only duty was to gripe.

I have almost stopped going to the National Press Club. It saddens me to have to say this but it hurt me every time I witnessed members taking the club as if it were a business establishment that they patronize and from which they could expect the best for the least amount of money. The personal hygiene of the members left much to be desired and this was obvious from the cigarette butts all over the place, the filth that could only have come from the lack of cooperation from the general patronage.

It is strange that the library, for instance, is the very same library that it was when we put up for the first time. Many good books are no longer in the shelves because some members have taken them home for their personal libraries. On had a right to expect that the library would receive personal donations from the members instead of being pirated of valuable editions. We once tried the honor system in the library but it turned out that even with the usual library registry rules, we were to lose our books.

The National Press Club is saddled with debts incurred by members who signed chits without regard to their ability to pay. The SWA (Social Welfare Administration) had nothing on the NPC. For many, the Press Club was for exploitation. Their answer to requests for payment was to stop going to the Press Club and to denounce it for arrogance or for unreasonableness on members.

The quality of the membership deserves one paragraph. Every self-proclaimed newspaperman feels that he has a “right” to membership and the officers of the club felt that some persons “have to be” taken in. It has never occurred to anyone that bad eggs should be eliminated from the membership and barred from entering the club in order to make the club a pleasant place for the rest of the newspapermen. We have had so many sad experiences with drunks and deadbeats that one would think we have learned a lesson but the truth is that we have not.

It has come to a point where members of the club don’t dare take their friends to the club because of the possibility that they would be accosted for a “touch” or perhaps engaged in a debate on subjects that have little or no interest for the guest. There was a time when foreign correspondents felt it a “must” to visit the National Press Club. Now, it is safer to show them the building and then detour them to more pleasant places for taking meals or snacks.

The National press Club was never meant to be anything but a club. It is not, and should not be molded into a headquarters for labor activities or politics. People are supposed to go to the club for relaxation from their daily toils – to sit with friends and contemplate the passing events in comparative ease, devoid of the tensions of a newspaper assignment. We have never learned to relax in the club. We have always tried to make it a battleground for ideas instead of tired heads and aching muscles.

There are many good newspapermen with executive abilities who could make the club work but they shy away from the National Press Club because they know that they would have to work alone and against odds if they want anything done at all. Unless we remove the “gimme” attitude of the members of the club and inspired in them, instead, a desire to do their part, we shall always have the building but no National Press Club.

One of the best examples of how we have ruined our own club is the way we butt into other people’s business. Almost no one is safe in giving a party in the NPC without the danger of being invaded by uninvited gusts or “kibitzers”. We have been thrown the rule book in our insane belief that since the NPC is “ours”, we can do in it what we please. In the process, we have ruined it even for our purposes.

It is incredible that the only time we get the newspapermen to go to the NPC is during election day. And most of the members go only to vote. Throughout the year, we have a handful of people who park around the club because they’ve been used to the idea or they have nowhere else to go. During special occasions, such as Gridiron Night or some special press conference, many who attend don’t want to pay their share of the expenses because they feel they have “rights”.

Unless we learned that we can’t have a real club unless we pitched in and did our share of responsibility, we shall never have one that we can be proud of. It is pointless for anyone to devote his entire energies to making a good club if that someone finds himself alone and derided for the effort.

In retrospect, I think we made a mistake in putting up this edifice called the National Press Club. We should have put up a more modest one that we could have improved as the years went by. The brutal truth is that we made the mistake of putting up a National Press Club building before we had a National Press Club in fact. We tried to build a club around a building and failed in the process. We’re still trying but the building is the handicap. Most of us feel that we “own” a share in the glory and the advantages but not in the work necessary to keep the club going.

We might save the day for the Philippine press if we elect dedicated men who will run for office in the club for what they can do for it and not for the glory that they will heap upon themselves by winning an election. The trouble today is that so many become candidates in the hope that with victory they shall be an inch taller. We need tall men who shall guide the membership, work with vigor and selflessness, not ambitious men who will inflict themselves on the club and to hell with what happens to it.

Perhaps it is time to dissociate glory from club officership. We need a permanent board of management who shall be chosen on merit and not by popularity vote. This, we must divorce from the elective board of the club who shall decide policies of the press as a professional body and help managers of the club re-make the National Press Club into a real social residence of the members. This is how they do it in the National Press Club in Washington and in other places they have successfully run press clubs.

We don’t stand to move ahead with our present ways of doing things. A politics-ridden club can only head for the scrap heap, let us forget personal glory and ambition and get together in putting up a press club that we can be proud of. We have the building. We have the land. What we don’t have is the will to make the most of our gifts of the civic community and of the government. We were given a toy but we are not playing with it. We are tearing it apart, piece by piece. There is still time to save it. If we cast aside pride, we can do it. It is later than we think.


Lifted from: The National Press Club of the Philippines 50 Golden Years

Thursday, July 3, 2008

Children of NPC members receive scholarships from Rotary International-Philippines and UNTV 37

June 29, 2008
SEED MONEY. National Press Club (NPC) President Benny D. Antiporda (3rd from right) shows off an envelope containing a check donation to the NPC worth P100, 000 from Ruth Soriano (3rd from left), niece of Filipino evangelist Eli Soriano, as “seed money” to help sustain the club’s budding scholarship program during the awarding of college scholarships to eight children of regular members of the NPC held at the Plaridel Hall of the NPC in Intramuros, Manila.Also in the photo are (from left) Jay Sonza, station manager of UNTV, NPC officials Percy Lapid (director),  Ronniel de Guzman (director), Amor Virata (auditor), Alvin Feliciano (director), Toto Causing (director), Jerry Yap (director) and Rolly Gonzalo (vice president).#



Children of NPC members receive scholarships from Rotary International-Philippines and UNTV 37

The Rotary International-Philippine District (RIPD) of Kamuning and UNTV 37 handed out college scholarships recently to 8 children of regular members of the National Press Club (NPC) at the Plaridel Hall of the NPC building in Intramuros, Manila.

The NPC and the RIPD recently signed a memorandum of agreement whereby the Rotary Club committed itself to pay for the college education of the children of NPC regular members.

The RIPD of Kamuning through its associate, broadcast journalist Daniel Razon of UNTV 37 and Ang Dating Daan (The Old Path) - a bible exposition on-air program by the Philippine-based religious organization, Members of the Church of God, helped raise the funds for the free college education for the said NPC scholars.

The study grants in financial aid provide full payment of college tuition and other miscellaneous fees to its benificiaries.

The college scholarships were formally given to the eight children and their parents during a short program which coincided with the club’s weekly Celebrity Night get-together. the affiar was attended by the officers and members of the NPC, RIDP-Kamuning and UNTV 37.

Ruth Soriano, niece of Filipino evangelist Eli Soriano also donated a check amounting to P100, 000 to the NPC as "seed money" to help sustain the club’s budding scholarship program which is being supervised by the club’s Committee of Education under the chairmanship of NPC director Alvin Feliciano.

Veteran broadcaster Jay Sonza, station manager of UNTV 37 said they will continue to support the club and its members as part of the station’s avowed mission to be the country’s public service channel.

The UNTV 37 which dubs itself as “the Philippines’ undisputed public service-based channel” has been providing free medical services to members of the NPC through its flagship program “Good Morning Kuya.”

“We are a public service-oriented TV station and we stake our positioning on public service, to the extent that all our shows and programs revolve around this concept.” (Q) ###

Tuesday, July 1, 2008

NPC statement on the murder of broadcaster Robert, Sison

STATEMENT OF THE NATIONAL PRESS CLUB OF THE PHILIPPINES

(On the killing of broadcaster and correspondent Robert Sison
in Sariaya, Quezon last June 30, 2008)
July 1, 2008

Ref:
Benny Antiporda, president
Joel Sy Egco, chairman, Press Freedom Committee


The National Press Club of the Philippines can only express dismay and indignation over the killing last Monday in Bgy. Lutukan, Sariaya, Quezon, of broadcaster and news correspondent, Robert 'Bert' Sison, by two motorcycle-riding gunmen.

From the information we have gathered, the victim was with her two daughters, Almira, 24, and Liwayway, 30, on board the family car, when they were waylaid by the suspects armed with .45 caliber pistols upon reaching Bgy. Lutukan, Sariaya.

They were on their way home after visiting Gov. Rafffy Nantes at his office where the victim even had a conversation with Quezon police director, Senior Supt. Fidel Posadas.

Further, the gunmen made sure that Sison would not survive since nine gunshot wounds were subsequently counted by the police who responded to the incident.

Witnesses even said one of the suspects approached the victim as he lay bloodied and helpless inside the car and peppered him with bullets.

This is another bloody page in the history of journalism in the country.

Coming as it did in the wake of the dismissal of the Makati Regional Trial Court of the complaint fellow journalists filed against the policemen who hauled them to jail after the Manila Peninsula siege coverage last November, the killing of Sison is another brutal reminder that Filipino journalists have much to be worried about as they carried on the risky job of bringing the truth to our people.

While we laud the Philippine National Police for immediately forming a special task force under the Quezon PPO to investigate this latest attack on press freedom, this would hardly bring comfort to Sison's family, friends, relatives and to the entire members of the Philippine media profession.

Only the quick apprehension of the suspects and the uncovering of the mastermind behind this attack can assure us that the government is committed to protecting journalists and that it is serious in removing the 'culture of impunity' that has emboldened those with gripes against the media to settle their differences in a violent manner.

We further note that this is the second violent attack against
Quezon-based journalists in since last year in the wake of the assassination attempt last April 19, 2007, against Philippine Daily Inquirer correspondent Delfin 'Sonny' Mallari and DZMM correspondent Johnny Glorioso.

We therefore urged the authorities to act decisively on this latest outrage as well as in the long list of pending cases of attacks that have victimized the members of the press. ###

Monday, June 30, 2008

Statement of NPC President Benny Antiporda on the Makati RTC dismissal of media class suit

In the decision made by Judge Reynaldo Laigo of Makati RTC Branch 56 on the complaint of several mediamen against the DILG and PNP in the Manila Peninsula Siege, he stated: “Under the given dangerous situation, that order issued by defendant NCRPO D. Geary Barias was lawful and appeared to have been disobeyed by all those including some of the plaintiffs, when they intentionally refused to leave the hotel for which an appropriate criminal charge under Article 151 of the Revised Penal Code, which is applicable to all even the media personalities, could have been initiated against them. Thus, their (plaintiffs Tordesillas, Deogracias, Hachero, Galvez and Santos) having been handcuffed and brought to Camp Bagong Diwa, Bicutan, Taguig City for investigation, and released thereafter was justified. It being in accord with the police procedure.”

What is the police procedure being referred to by Judge Laigo? In as much as the “MIRANDA RIGHTS” of the plaintiff mediamen were not even read at the time of their handcuffing during the Manila Peninsula incident, this is clearly a violation of the Bill of Rights which is penalized under Republic Act 7438, Section 2.

And the fact that the police did not file a single case against the mediamen they arrested and detained only proves that there was no violation of any existing law. Which means that their handcuffing violates their rights under the Bill of Rights, Article 3, Section 2.

Is Judge Laigo ignorant of the law, or is there someone behind him dictating what is the law?

Sunday, June 29, 2008

The making of an ‘institutional shelter’

By Mitos Garcia

When Marcelo H. del Pilar founded the Diayryong Tagalog in 1882, he never dreamed there would come a day that the Philippine press would become an organized force against any kind of repression.

Neither could he have imagined that, in a mere 70 years, the Philippine press would have evolved from the clandestine operations of a few stalwarts here and abroad, to a full-pledged, nationwide force with its own building beside Jones bridge, across the Plaza Cervantes – about two kilometers from the birthplace of del Pilar’s contemporary, revolutionary leader Andres C. Bonifacio in Binondo.

On October 29, 1952, the national Press Club came into being as a formal organization, duly registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission, after two years of gestation. Former NPC president Olaf Giron wrote this book “Once Upon a Club”.

Giron’s book cites an “anonymous” newsman’s tale published by the NPC in 1962 to commemorate its first 10 years of existence edited by Amado Inciong.

Is says the idea of organizing “was born during a huddle of Manila City Hall and police reporters one timorous afternoon in 1950. Scene of the huddle was Aling Miling’s store, where the reporters used to park to sip cheap coffee or dine in those unaffluent days.”

The reporters had been alarmed by threats of reprisals from some “dreaded” City hall and police characters brought about by “unflattering reports” about them in the newspapers.

“Hence, instead of engaging in ‘smart’ conversations, as usual, the reporters talked grimly this time. Everybody was immediately concerned with his personal safety and the freedom of the press. Out of this huddle shaped up the need, painfully felt by all, for an ‘institutional shelter,’ for organizing the working press into a body which can exert restraining influence upon those who would want to suppress, infringe, limit or otherwise undermine press freedom. Thus was conceived the NPC idea.”

This was the post-war press, which found itself in physical danger due to its fearless reporting. But unlike in Del Pilar’s time, the threat did not come from a foreign conqueror but from fellow Filipinos gone wrong.

Hoever, like the Filipino newsmen of Del Pilar’s time, the post-war reporters refused to be cowed. Instead, they banded together to fight the evil that begun to make its iron hand felt.

But to quote Giron’s book: “The idea of uniting the working press on a nationwide scale was not new. Before the war there was the Manila Press Club, which sought to organize all metropolitan journalists along the pattern of trade unionism.

“Dismembered during the war years, this was revived immediately after the liberation in the form of the real trade union – the Philippine Newspaper Guild, which played a leading role in the formation and direction of the now defunct Congress of Labor Organizations.”

The Philippine Newspaper Guild was dissolved together with the militant Congress of Labor Organizations, which had been outlawed allegedly for “communist involvement.”

Having seen this happen, the newly-founded NPC’s leaders decided to limit the Club’s functions to providing entertainment and relaxation to its members, at the same time keeping it away from getting embroiled in controversial issues or advocacies.

Domingo C. Abadilla, NPC president 9in 1957-1958, wrote a glowing account about the Business Writers Association of the Philippines (BWAP) which sponsored the first two luncheon meetings which formulated plans to organize the Club.

The first was held at the Panciteria Nacional, where the group approved the idea of organizing a federation. During the second meeting, however, they created an 18-man “Executive committee for the Establishment of a Newspapermen’s Organization,” which decided to make the NPC a non-stock corporation. They discarded the federation idea, Membership was to be individual.

“Politicians, writes Giron, “immediately sensed the uses of the NPC in the politics of power … The meeting (and first elections) was held at Malacanang, nerve center of the national politics, with the late President (Elpidio) Quirino as host and, to the surprise of the President himself, also guest speaker.”

The first president elected in the Malacanang polls was Luciano Millan, who served for two consecutive terms from 1952 to 1954. (He later became a member of Congress).

Millan was followed in 1954 by Eugenio Santos, for a one-year term, after which Teodoro F. Valencia was elected. Valencia was the last NPC president, because it was in his term that the new NPC building was finished.

How the NPC obtained the land and got the building constructed ism, itself, an interesting and significant milestone in the annals of the Philippine press.

Antonio Alano of the Manila Bulletin, Jose Guevara of the Manila Times, and Jose Nable of the Manila Chronicle, Congress reporters of note, worked to get Congress to enact a law authorizing the President of the NPC a parcel of government land on Magallanes Drive, for a nominal price of one peso.

Congress passed R.A. 905 authorizing the sale of 5,184.7 square meters of land to the NPC, and President Quirino signed it into law on December 23, 1953. Millan paid the price and the deed was made over to the NPC.

Where the NPC building stands is actually a 4,288-squaremeter lot (under Transfer Certificate of Title no. 38690 entered at Manila on March 8, 1955, after Valencia became NPC president) of prime real estate in historic Intramuros. The PLDT now occupies about one-half of the land on a 50-year lease.

The building itself is a historic monument to the ideal of press freedom and unity among colleagues in the newspaper industry, designed by Architect Angel E. Nakpil, and constructed by Alberto T. Abaya.

In the 1953 national elections, President Quirino lost to Ramon Magsaysay who happened to be as generous to the NPC. He appointed NPC president Eugenio Santos as general manger of the Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office, which enabled him to get the Rehabilitation Finance Corporation to approve a loan for the construction of the NPC building.

The loan, amounting to P354,600, was released in 1954 on representation made by Valencia, who had by then succeeded Santos as NPC president.

The NPC building was inaugurated amid much fanfare and anticipation on December 30, 1955. President Magsaysay was the sponsor, along with several cabinet members, other government officials and other donors.

Valencia’s heroic efforts to give the Philippine press a truly viable home-away-from-home must be emphasized here. He worked almost single-handedly to raise funds for the installation of an elevator and air conditioners.

His first contributor President Magsaysay, and this set the wheels in motion that got him P150,000. Businessmen and other individuals followed the President’s example. The bigges contributors, according to Giron, were The Manila Times and the Manila Chronicle, which gave P5,000 each.

However, some credit must also go to the burgeoning female population of the Club. According to Giron: “The women of the press were the first big contributors of the NPC building fund. They put up a benefit show at the Manila Hotel and turned over the collection to the NPC.”

“To this amount were added the proceeds from the first Gridiron dinner held at the University of the East auditorium by the entertainment committee headed by Joaquin P. Roces of the Manila Times.”

When the levators and air conditioners had been installed, what funds he still had left over Valencia used to furnish the NPC bar (the NPC’s main attraction donated by Stanvac), library (books donated by the Asia foundation) and the restaurant (with music system donated by Don Andres Soriano).

The origins of the famous mural painted on the south wall of the NPC restaurant by famous artist Vicente Manasala remain obscure, however.

Giron’s book mentions in passing that Valencia purchased the Manasala mural, without giving further details. But according to Neal Cruz (As I See It, NPC Digest, July 2001 issue), the mural is a “donation of the Lopez family ... A condition of the donation, as I heard it, is that the mural would be returned to the Lopez family once it is removed from the NPC premises.”

While the building was under construction, the plan included “a huge mural in the dining room and the planners solicited the financial help of the Lopez patriarch, Don Eugenio Lopez, Sr. , then owner of the Chronicle.”

With his own money, Valencia purchased a television set for the NPC and the records of the music system.

In its 50 years of existence, the NPC has gone through much trial and travail. Unlike other big organizations, it cannot charge high membership fees due to the pecuniary deficiency of most media members.

Underpaid, overworked, they all look forward to a couple of hours of socializing over a bottle or two of beer, meticulously priced at a minimum at the NPC bar. More affluent members take red or white wine and some “pulutan.”

The Club’s Board of directors decided to close down temporarily the bar and restaurant, due to a labor problem that literally brought in down to its knees. To compensate, a garden restaurant was opened on the front grounds of the Club so that members can still have their enjoyment.

In fairness to the present administration the Club’s financial woes are a problem that has festered for decades. As early as Mac Vicencio’s incumbency (1962-1963) the Club was found to be almost bankrupt. Somebody called Vicencio “the first NPC reform president.”

In 1976, the Joaquin Cuanan & Co. was authorized by Board Resolution 17-76 (9-8) to audit the NPC, due to certain defects noted by then NPC president Pat Gonzales in the accounting and financial aspects of Club operations. The auditing firm’s report revealed some shocking things, better not mentioned her.

Under the present circumstances, as the inheritor of the biggest set of problems the Club has ever faced – not just financial but also having to do with labor and other arenas – then perhaps Louie Lograta can aptly be called the second NPC reform president. -- lifted from: THE NATIONAL PRESS CLUB OF THE PHILIPPINES 50 GOLDEN YEARS ###